RSS

In a digital world, we are not defined by the media we own

20 Apr

The other day, a story about how people are still buying DVDs caught my eye – and it got me thinking. According to the Ars Technica article, which cites a report by consumer tracking firm NPD Group, online video streaming – the likes of Netflix et al – is growing but the overwhelming majority of people still buy and rent DVDs.

About 77% of people who reported watching a movie between January and March did so on DVD or Blu-ray, versus only 21% who did so through some sort of on-demand service on their TV.

As the NPD analyst put it:

With the well publicized struggles of Blockbuster and retail video stores closing around the country, and with media attention increasingly focused on the newest digital home-video offerings, the value and importance of physical formats to the home video industry and to consumers is often overlooked. Even though DVD sales and rentals are slowing, there is no evidence that consumers are abandoning physical discs for watching movies, even as the choices for viewing are expanding.

The story brought to mind some things I’ve been pondering for some time. I’ve been wondering why people still buy movies. I’ve also been wondering why people ever bought movies.

I’m as guilty as the next person. I’m a movie buff and have amassed a decent collection of DVDs, while my Blu-ray collection is respectable. But I browsed my collection the other day and realized that I’ve only ever watched about 5% more than once. That’s an awful lot of wasted money. The discs also take up a lot of space, require dusting and are a pain in the event of moving house.

The same goes double for books. I’m always hungering for something new to read, so I can probably count the number of books I’ve read more than once on one hand. I buy them and they just sit there. CDs are a similar story, although they generally get more mileage. Still, I’ve found that as I get older my tastes tend to settle more and more around a few selected artists. I can’t remember the last time I’ve listened to half my CDs.

A lot of people believe we’re heading toward a cloud-based future, if we’re not there already, where we don’t actually own physical copies of our media. Our books, movies and music will instead exist on the internet, where we can access them from wherever we are and whenever we want. Netflix is already a great example of this for movies, while a number of internet companies are looking to do the same with music (I wrote about them for MSN, that story should be up soon). The benefits of such a world are obvious: we don’t have to store, clean and move our media, yet we can get it whenever we want.

So why do people still buy physical media, like DVDs? Well, obviously digital technology is still improving and many people aren’t yet fully comfortable with it. But there’s a deeper reason: Whether it’s books, DVDs or CDs, we have built collections of physical media in order to define ourselves as people.

Such collections have served as chronicles of our lives and personalities. Our media, usually displayed as a mini-museum in our living room, tells others the story of who we are and it reminds us of how we got there. Want to learn a good deal about a person? Take a look at their CD or movie collection. “Oh, I see you have the entire Cure collection. You must like being depressed. The entire Robotech cartoon series on DVD? I see that you’re a nerd.” And so on. Conversely, you may look at a particular book on the shelf and remember reading it in high school, thereby recalling pleasant (or terrible) memories.

As more and more people go all digital – and they will because the benefits are undeniable – this is going to change. Our living rooms will no longer be shrines to who we are and were. There’s going to be a lot more space, perhaps for plants or artwork – possibly even that which we create ourselves, like photos displayed in digital frames.

But with this digital shift, will the need to define ourselves by media be obviated? Not likely – but it too is going to morph. Millions of people already list their favourite movies and bands on their Facebook profiles and in other social media. These online services are the digital equivalents of book shelves and CD holders. There’s a big difference, though, because in the online world you can define yourself by what you say you like, as opposed to the real world where there is physical evidence.

By abandoning the physical proof of who we are and were, our identities are inexorably shifting to what we want them to be as opposed to what they really are. Is that a good thing? I don’t know. I’m still puzzling it out.

One thing is for sure: if you own stock in a company that makes shelving units, you’d probably be smart to sell it.

Advertisements
 
5 Comments

Posted by on April 20, 2011 in internet, media, netflix

 

5 responses to “In a digital world, we are not defined by the media we own

  1. Nav

    April 20, 2011 at 7:22 am

    This is really interesting – especially that idea about presenting who we want to be through digital media rather than ‘expressing it’ through what we own. In a way, it expresses a shift in how academics now think about identity – that its performative and processual rather than this thing inside us.

    Felix Salmon and others also talked about a report on piracy that had some similar ideas about how collecting media is changing, particularly since libraries get so big.

    http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/03/29/the-best-report-ever-on-media-piracy/?

     
  2. Chris

    April 20, 2011 at 12:46 pm

    This is indeed an interesting subject, not necessarily because of its implications (representing what we want others to see us as, versus of who we are from physical evidence), as much as the realization we, as a materialistic society, are in crisis.

    The problem is this: we have much, too much stuff. Just look at the size of new houses versus what people considered comfortable just 50 years ago… Modern houses are mansions compared to what they were in the 60s and 70s. the storage and warehouse industry is booming. My own living room is crumbing under the tons of stuff I’ve accumulated over the past 40 years. I have stopped buying CDs, DVDs and book simply because I don’t have room anymore, as there are no walls without stuff in my house anymore, and several rooms that have been converted, as the kids moved out, into storage.

    So for me, it’s a necessity to move into the fully digital realm. One external hard drive contains the same data a full room full of books contains!

    However, it disturbs me that you are so enthusiastic about the so-called “Cloud”. If anything, the move toward the cloud should be treated with great circumspection, because it threatens the basic rights of people to their content and, if anything, the present trend of corporations and governments toward stripping rights away from individuals (most licensing agreements severely restrict not only user rights, but creator rights as well), is truly frightening.

    In other words, the trend toward digital media is a blessing inasmuch as it gives the individual total access to his property, whereas we should treat the move to the “Cloud” with much greater circumspection, as it requires relinquishing individual rights to entities whose only interest is, in the end, is to limit access to it and monetize it.

    And yes, I DO keep copies of everything I post online, and use a local word processor of my choice to edit what I write 😉

     
    • petenowak2000

      April 20, 2011 at 3:42 pm

      That’s the beauty of choice. For people who are concerned about their rights to the digital content they buy, they can always stick to physical media. The cloud will only continue and succeed so long as the benefits outweigh the tradeoffs.

       
      • Chris

        April 21, 2011 at 1:52 am

        Agreed, there are indeed many benefits to the Cloud. Heck, more often than not it’s easier to find stuff online than on my hard drives…

        But I’ll ALWAYS keep an original (and a backup) on a hard drive that I can lay my hands on.

        Sure, I don’t care for CDs and DVDs and use the Cloud more and more. But don’t think one minute that for this reason, I am willing to forfeit my rights to use the contents the way I see fit (most of my movies are living on my external hard drives and if breaking encryption to transfer them was wrong, let me say this to the Media Moguls: DRM is STEALING from your own paying customer)

         
  3. sparkyd

    April 27, 2011 at 2:52 pm

    In our house we have reached the conclusion that we don’t want physical media anymore. We’ve got bins of CDs stored somewhere but I’ll never buy another one. We’re done buying DVDs (other than perhaps the occasional one for the kids, but even there we generally stick to using the PVR and TMNs VOD service… Netflix will come to our house eventually). As for books, I still like to read actual books, but I’m getting 95% of them from the library instead of buying them. I had been hesitant about getting rid of my shelves of books precisely because I sometimes liked to gaze upon them, even if I never read anything twice. However, goodreads.com changed all that and gave me the tool I needed to be able to ditch the physical books and still have online “bookshelves” as evidence of what I’ve read. You can even pick the cover that matches the edition you read. Sweet.

     
 
%d bloggers like this: